It’s a “sad day for America, not ‘cause … they were guilty verdicts, because I can’t come out and have an honest, decent conversation with the people of America,” Navarro said. Navarro was briefly interrupted by protesters when he left the courthouse after the verdict was read Thursday. He told Woodward that he was not going to rule on the mistrial request without receiving more briefing and evidence. Mehta said he knew that jurors had asked to take their break outside, where they were accompanied by a court security officer, but that he was not aware that protestors were in the park. Woodward countered that Navarro himself had been “accosted” earlier in the day by a protestor when he was coming through that park. “It’s impossible for us to know what influence that would have” on their verdict.Ĭrabb challenged the idea that there were protestors in the park next to the courthouse where the jurors took their break. “It’s obvious the jury would have heard those protestors,” Woodward said. Navarro lawyers seek mistrial after juror breakĪfter the jury was dismissed, Woodward told the judge that the defense was seeking a mistrial because they had learned the jury had taken an outdoor break shortly before rendering the verdict and that during that break, they were around a “number” of January 6-related protestors demonstrating and chanting outside of the court. Navarro stood directly across the room with his hands clasped and stared at jurors intently. The jury was attentive during closing arguments, watching carefully as lawyers presented their final case. Woodward eventually jumped up and whispered to his client, and the two stood quietly together for the remainder of the proceeding. The gestures elicited strong reactions from Navarro, who at times threw up his hand, shook his head or laughed. What matters is where he wasn’t.”Ĭrabb repeatedly referred to Navarro as “that man’ while pointing to him, telling the jury at one point, “that man thinks he is above the law.” Prosecutor John Crabb responded: “Who cares where he was. Navarro was or what he was doing” on the day of the scheduled deposition, Woodward asked the jury. “Why didn’t the government present evidence to you about where Dr. He also said that prosecutors failed to prove that Navarro was willful in his failure to comply with the subpoena, arguing that prosecutors hadn’t established that his non-compliance with the demand for testimony was not the result of a mistake or accident. Navarro’s attorney Stanley Woodward contested the idea that the subpoena was simple, staying that the subpoena did not specify where in the Capitol complex Navarro was supposed to show up for his deposition. “The subpoena – it is not hard to understand,” she said, adding that Navarro knew “what he was required to do and when he was required to do it.” Justice Department attorney Elizabeth Aloi said that government only works if people play by the rules and are held accountable if they don’t. Prosecutors told the jury during closing arguments Thursday that Navarro “made a choice” not to comply with a February 2022 subpoena. I imagine that those under indictment right now are getting a good reminder of that right now,” Mulvey told CNN in a statement. Like the other witnesses who attempted to stonewall the committee, he thought he was above the law. “His defiance of the committee was brazen. Tim Mulvey, former spokesperson for House January 6 committee, celebrated the verdict. The judge scheduled Navarro’s sentencing for January 12, 2024. Trump tells judge he may try to move Georgia election interference case to federal court Former President Donald Trump steps off his plane as he arrives at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport on Thursday, August 24.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |